Over the last couple of years, I've taken to submitting a few of my homebrewed beer to various AHA / BJCP-sanctioned competitions. I haven't done this with the intent to win anything, per se, but I thought it would be a good venue for getting an objective opinion about my beers and maybe some helpful tips for improvement.
I suffer - as I imagine many homebrewers do - from a little bit of tunnel vision when it comes to my own beer. I suppose I'm too close to it, having brewed it myself, but it's more difficult for me to evaluate my own beer accurately than another person's.
Anyway, I've received some very valuable feedback on everything I've entered thus far. I highly recommend homebrewers who are just getting in to the rhythm of brewing their own beer to seek out as many objective opinions as possible. It will only improve your brewing skills over time. Particularly, "official" homebrew comeptitions provide a reliable source for valuable feedback that is really hard to come by otherwise.
Occasionally, too, it's nice to have your efforts rewarded/reinforced when you happen to place with one of your brews! I recently sent my '
Dualism' - a particularly strong (9.8% ABV) Baltic Porter - to the
2nd Annual Strong Beer Competition in Georgia. Much to my genuine surprise, it took 1st place in its category (specialty beer). Then, to my complete amazement, it took an over all 3rd place in the Best of Show round. You can see the comeplete competition results
here.
Because this particular beer was oaked in Chambourcin-infused American oak, and it is a really high alcohol beer, I didn't enter it in its own classification. I debated this one, because Dualism is a style-buster of sorts, but it appears I made a good choice in retrospect. Bottom line, even though the beer itself performed far better than I'd have imagined it would, I still received very good advice from the judges that means more to me that a couple of ribbons.
Don't get me wrong, though ... the ribbons are nice too!